Supreme Court asks all states to focus on planned welfare spending.

The Supreme Court of India has strongly criticised the distribution of “freebies” by political parties in all states. The court made the remarks during a hearing in India. It warned that such schemes may affect the financial health of the country.

The court said political parties should not rely on free distribution of resources. Instead, they should introduce planned policies that improve people’s lives. It suggested welfare measures like unemployment support schemes as better alternatives.

Chief Justice Surya Kant said large free distributions could slow economic development. He said the State has a duty to provide support to people. However, the effect of free benefits must be carefully examined.

He also pointed out that many states are running financial deficits. Despite this, they continue to announce free schemes. He questioned why a part of the yearly revenue cannot be used for development work instead of giveaways. He noted that around 25 percent of the revenue collected every year could be directed toward development projects.

The court clarified that the matter does not concern any single state. It applies to all states across the country. The judges said the issue is related to planned expenditure and financial responsibility.

Justice Joymalya Bagchi said governments should present clear budget proposals. They should explain how much money is planned for unemployment support and other welfare spending. The court stressed that financial decisions must be justified and structured.

The judges emphasised that welfare schemes should focus on long-term improvement of living standards. They indicated that direct free distribution without planning may put pressure on public finances.

The court also observed that governments must balance welfare and development spending. Support for citizens should continue, but it should follow a proper financial plan. The judges noted that unplanned spending may affect economic growth.
The remarks highlight concerns over increasing expenditure on free schemes by various states. The court indicated that financial discipline is necessary to ensure sustainable development. It stressed that public money should be used carefully.

The court did not issue directions against any specific state. It addressed the issue as a nationwide financial policy matter. The observations were made to encourage responsible budgeting and structured welfare planning.

The discussion may influence how governments design welfare programmes in future budgets. States may be expected to justify expenditure more clearly and focus on development-oriented support.Further hearings and responses from governments are expected in upcoming proceedings.

Read More: Raghav Chadha Calls for ‘Right to Recall’ for MPs and MLAs in India